Tuesday, June 30, 2009
What is Al Sharpton doing?
Al Franken a Senator? Oh God
Does Obama Have a Problem with those who disagree with him?
The Need for the Flat Tax
One of the most pressing issues facing the
I am in favor of this and believe we should change to this for two fundamental reasons I feel strongly about. The first is that our debt and deficit is completely out of control. With more money going out than going in, this would help offset that and hopefully turn things around.
The second reason I believe in the flat tax is because of equality. For far too long
It is doubtful that this flat tax will be passed anytime soon (Democrats vehemently oppose it because they like to give out government hand outs), but I have hopes that if Republicans are ever in power that they will pursue a plan similar to this. The middle class and upper class cannot and should not be saddled with anymore of the tax burden. Our taxes pay for the free services that the illegal immigrants and the lower class use. It is time that we all pay into the system and reap what we sow.
Monday, June 29, 2009
Obama, Taxes, and Healthcare
President Obama and our congressional representatives in
To make matters worse, the most expensive piece of the liberal agenda is currently being developed in both houses of Congress. That legislation would be the healthcare reform we have been told about for years. Well, it is being developed with explicit instructions coming from the top not to consult with Republicans on it. A moderate Democratic congressman from
However, we cannot and should not develop a healthcare reform plan. I am in favor of one if we can pay for it, but we cannot. The Democratic majority in Congress sees it fit to spend money like drunken sailors buying banks, auto companies, and spend on pork barrel bills; leaving us in the largest fiscal hole we have ever been in. That leaves two options for the President and Congress to consider. The first one is to cut spending. Judging by how much Congress has been passing in regards to spending bills, like a $787 billion stimulus bill that has not worked at all; I highly doubt they will embrace that. Option number 2 is to raise taxes, which is political suicide. There have been talks of raising the income tax, cigarette tax, the liquor tax, or any little thing the liberals can think of. Well, I say no. Americans pay enough in income taxes as it is to pay for the current welfare state. Congress wants us to pay more because they spent it all foolishly and want to provide healthcare to other people? I think not. As much as I am not a fan of smoking, it is an individuals right to do as they see fit and I think we have taxed the poor smokers as much as possible. Finally, raising taxes on alcohol? No, no, no. Everyone enjoys a drink once in awhile and seeing how we are drowning in bad economic news, it seems to me that some people might want to drown their sorrows and not have to pay more to Nancy Pelosi. Democrats should also take note. You may have good approval ratings, but the one area where you are slipping drastically is with spending and taxes. Keep it up and you may not like what you see.
With all of this being said, the only logical choice is for Congress to do a few things. One, stop spending so much money! It is not your money, it is ours, and we don’t want it being spent on half the things you spend it on. Two, don’t you dare raise taxes because you never learned the concept of balancing a checkbook. It might be smart to institute a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution because you guys just suck at it. Three, stop proposing costly government run programs. We may need it, but we can’t afford it. It is wishful, liberal thinking. Save it for a rainy day. Five, start paying down the debt and deficit because something has got to give soon. It is a sad day in this country when we cannot afford a healthcare plan because of financial mismanagement. That is why I am forced to conclude that we can not and should not pass healthcare reform until we can properly pay for it. There is no telling when that could be.
Glenn Beck's Common Sense
Global Warming Not Man Made?
Obama to Raise Taxes?
"Ed Henry: will Obama still rule out signing any bill that raises taxes on people making under $250,000 a year?
"I think we get this question once a week," Gibbs says. "I think in many ways...what marks the difference between this health care effort and other health care efforts is exactly what the president described: a very large table with people sitting at it...We haven't drawn a lot of bright lines."
Dodge of the day -- asked, point-blank, if Obama's no-new-taxes pledge was still operative in the context of health care reform, Gibbs replies: "We're gonna let the process work its way through."
Bernie Madoff's Ponzi Scheme Gets Him 150 years
Sotomayor's Reverse Racist Decision
Just this morning, the Supreme Court issues a ruling in the case of white firefighters, denied a promotion based on race, in
Judge Sotomayor has been criticized for wanting to judge cases based on her life experiences, instead of what the law says. A good example is this case. Can someone explain to me how it is fair for a group of firefighters taking a promotion exam, passing it, but being denied the promotion because no minorities passed it? This isn’t fair and is another sickening example of a liberal policy designed to give minorities, who may not be qualified for a job, a chance to get the job over white people just because of their skin color or background. That is the definition of reverse discrimination. Being a minority should not entitle one to receive preferential treatment over others. In order to move ahead in the world, whether to get into college or to get a promotion should be based on merit. If you deserve it, you earned it. Those that don’t aren’t qualified for it and should not get it; I don’t care what your background is. I am really pleased with the Supreme Court realizing this and correcting a gross injustice, partially carried out by Judge Sotomayor.
Sotomayor has said that she will not judge cases by the letter of the law, so why on earth would she be appointed to the Supreme Court? I am sick and tired of liberal activist judges who are rewriting laws based on the Democratic Party’s ideology. It is happening all over the country. Judges are allowing more abortions, overturning the will of the people and allow gay marriage (which is a whole other issue), and are allowing minorities to get a leg up over everyone else. Judge Sotomayor, no doubt experienced the benefits of affirmative action both as a woman and as a Hispanic. No, I am not being a racist or sexist, I am explaining how she is operating. Because she is judging on her life experiences, as she said, then since she received preferential treatment, she wants that to continue. President Obama’s goal is to add someone like this to the Supreme Court to add another voice in the hopes of liberalizing the court’s rulings. I sincerely hope that does not happen, because right now the Supreme Court is the last line of defense from a liberal onslaught.
Based on Judge Sotomayor’s lack of sense in dealing with this case, coupled with her feelings on how to judge cases (refusing to follow the law), then I do not think she should be confirmed. Now I am in the minority on that and she probably will. I just hope during her hearings that responsible legislators will question her on these troubling things and inform the American people about just the kinds of people President Obama wants deciding issues of law, not based on the Constitution, but on personal biases. It is not personal against Judge Sotomayor, but she just is not the kind of Supreme Court Justice this country wants or needs. Having someone supporting reverse racism is not acceptable.